Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sb167 Film Incentive topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senators debate boosting Utah film incentive; sponsor seeks ROI numbers and circled bill for further work
Summary
Senator Winterton proposed increasing Utah's film incentive cap from about $6.79 million toward $15 million to retain productions and support rural economies. Colleagues pressed for clearer return‑on‑investment data and warned about competitive 'bid wars' with other states; the bill was circled for further analysis.
Senate debate over Senate Bill 167 on Tuesday focused on proposed increases to the state film incentive program. Senator Winterton presented a visual briefing showing past local impacts from film and television production and asked colleagues to consider raising the cap (currently about $6.79 million) to $15 million to keep large productions in Utah. He cited an example from a prior production that generated roughly $5.7 in local economic activity for every $1 expended in the state.
Senator Bramble pressed the sponsor for empirical justification and asked for a clear estimate of the return to state tax revenue rather than overall economic activity. Several senators echoed concern that film incentive metrics vary widely depending on the study methodology: the sponsor cited studies ranging from a 14:1 to as high as 30:1 return when measured as overall gross economic activity, and described the local economic benefits reported by businesses in rural counties. A number of senators also raised the risk of entering a bidding war with other states that offer higher or uncapped incentives; Senator Andriggs framed the choice as a competitive exchange and argued against a literal 'bid war' with Montana.
Other senators spoke in favor of the bill because of rural job creation and local supply‑chain benefits. Senator Winterton pledged to compile more precise ROI figures for tax revenue impact and asked the body to circle the bill while he gathers those numbers; the Senate agreed to circle SB 167 for further review.
Next steps: the sponsor will provide requested ROI data and a budgetary analysis while SB 167 remains circled for the near term.
