Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Vehicle Registration Notice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate tables bill to restore vehicle-registration postcards amid fiscal-note questions
Summary
Senators debated first substitute House Bill 170, sponsored by Sen. Jani Iwamoto, which would allow mailed registration-renewal notices to help seniors and rural residents; after questions about the bill's fiscal note and its impact on state revenue the Senate tabled the measure on third reading for further fiscal review.
Senator Jani Iwamoto, sponsor of first substitute House Bill 170, told the Senate the bill would restore an option for mailed vehicle-registration renewal notices after agencies cut postcard mailings as part of budget reductions. Iwamoto said constituents — especially seniors and residents in rural areas without reliable internet — called and emailed with concerns after they missed renewals and were stopped by police. He said the Utah State Tax Commission reported an estimated $1,000,000 in cost reductions for the state and counties in fiscal year 2021 tied to the mailer change, which prompted the initial decision to stop postcards.
Senator Bramble questioned the bill’s fiscal note and whether the appropriation subcommittee had prioritized the cost. Senator Bramble and others noted that while the state is losing revenue when registrations lapse, the fiscal note attached to the bill shows a negative cost (discussed in the hearing as approximately $546,500). He asked why restoring mailers — which sponsors said could increase timely renewals and improve revenue timing — would be shown as a net fiscal negative. Iwamoto said he would follow up to clarify the discrepancy and had spoken to Representative Chu about the numbers.
After discussion, Iwamoto moved HB170 to the third-reading calendar and the roll call showed the bill received 25 'yay' votes and no recorded 'nay' votes with four senators absent. Senator Stevenson then moved to table the bill on third reading to address fiscal-note concerns. The motion to table passed, and the bill was placed on hold on third reading pending clarification of costs.
What’s next: The sponsor committed to follow up with the Utah State Tax Commission and Representative Chu about the fiscal note. The bill remains tabled on third reading until the Senate receives and reviews updated cost information.
