Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Intermountain Power Agency topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate passes Intermountain Power Agency oversight bill 22–7 after floor debate

Utah State Senate · November 9, 2021
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate Bill 2,002, amending the Interlocal Cooperation Act to add legislative audit authority, limit creation of 'segments' and remove certain eminent-domain privileges, passed the Utah Senate 22–7. Sponsors said oversight is needed before major bond and contract steps; several senators supported passage with caveats and asked for stakeholder meetings.

The Utah Senate passed Senate Bill 2,002 — an amendment to the Interlocal Cooperation Act focused on the Intermountain Power Agency (IPA) — by a roll-call vote of 22–7 and sent the measure to the House.

Senator Owens, the sponsor, described long-running concerns about IPA's governance and exemptions from open-meeting, procurement and audit laws. "It clarifies that a project entity and taxed local inter ... are subject to audits by the office of Legislative Auditor General," Owens said on the floor, arguing the statutory posture left counties with limited oversight and litigation burdens.

Members pressed the sponsor on economic implications. Senator Kitchen and others noted that projects tied to IPA involve very large financing — the transcript includes two figures discussed on the floor: roughly $2,000,000,000 in recent investment discussions and an upcoming project(s) described by the sponsor as on the order of $5,500,000,000 — and asked whether expedited action could affect investment predictability. Owens acknowledged the scale and said oversight was needed before bond and contract steps were finalized.

Several senators voiced conditional support. Senator Bramble and Senator Vickers said they would vote yes 'with an asterisk,' urging the sponsor to convene stakeholders and refine language to protect municipalities and bond-market confidence. Senator Kitchen and others expressed concern about eminent domain and the speed of special-session action but cited willingness to work on targeted fixes.

After debate and several recorded explanations, the presiding officer announced SB 2002 had passed the Senate with 22 yay votes and 7 nay votes and will be transmitted to the House for further consideration.