Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves groundwater and water‑coordination measures, adds study on provider coordination
Summary
The Utah Senate substituted and advanced SB 53 to clarify artificial groundwater recharge as a beneficial use and substituted SB 76 to add a study on coordination among water providers; sponsors clarified recharge will not change existing water rights in the examples discussed.
The Utah Senate addressed two water-related items Jan. 22, advancing a statutory clarification on groundwater recharge and adding a study of inter-provider coordination to a broader water package.
Senator Vickers presented a first substitute for Senate Bill 53 (Groundwater Use Amendments). He said the substitute restores language previously struck and would allow certain entities that are not formal conservancy districts to pursue artificial groundwater recharge as a recognized beneficial use under the oversight of the state engineer and relevant water-quality processes. During floor questioning, Senator Reby asked whether recharging an aquifer would change water rights attached to that aquifer. Senator Vickers replied, "So that water does not have a water right attached to it... So when it goes into the ground, there is no water right necessarily attached to that water," describing the sponsor’s intent that captured runoff used for recharge not carry existing water rights. After discussion the Senate voted to read the substitute a third time and recorded passage.
On Senate Bill 76 (water amendments), Senator Sandel moved to delete the title and body and replace it with a first substitute that incorporates a study of how water providers can find greater efficiency by coordinating across traditional boundaries (subdivisions, water conservancy districts and providers). Sponsor Senator Bridal described that the added study will help quantify potential water savings from unsiloing systems. The body agreed to substitute the bill and then placed the substituted measure on circle to allow senators time to review the changes.
Both items reflect incremental statutory adjustments and directed study authority rather than immediate changes to allocation procedures; sponsors emphasized coordination and that the examples discussed were intended to be conducted under state-engineer oversight and water-quality review.
What happens next: SB 53 was read a third time and recorded as passed on the floor and will be transmitted to the House; SB 76 was substituted and circled for later consideration so staff and members can review the new study language.
