Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Board Partisanship topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House narrowly approves clarification on partisan status of State Board candidacies
Summary
On March 14, 2019, the Utah House approved Senate Bill 236 (SB 2 36) by a one-vote margin to clarify that candidates for the State Board of Education may run as partisan or nonpartisan candidates. Debate centered on a pending court case and whether the change politicizes education.
Get email alerts on the School Board Partisanship topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah House on March 14 approved language clarifying the partisan status of State Board of Education candidates in Senate Bill 236, a measure that drew sustained floor debate and a close recorded vote.
Representative Last, the sponsor, said the change was intended to clarify intent from earlier legislation and to make clear candidates can run as partisans, unaffiliated or as write-in candidates. “We intended to suggest that you could if you wanted to,” Last said, describing the amendment as a clarification of the original 2016 policy.
Opponents argued the change is premature while litigation over the earlier law is on appeal and warned of injecting partisan politics into public education. Representative Ward warned that the court’s pending decision could render the legislation moot, and Representative Paulson said the matter deserved a committee hearing and more public input. Representative Carol Moss argued that making the school board partisan risks politicizing decisions that should focus on student welfare.
Supporters, including Representative Brammer and Representative Gibson, said the clarification improves voter information and that partisan support could help voters identify candidates and hold them accountable. Brammer suggested that a partisan route could make school board candidates better known to voters.
After extended debate the House adopted Senate Bill 236 on a narrow recorded vote, 38 yes to 37 no. The bill will be sent to the Senate for the president’s signature. The floor record shows continued division among members about the timing and wisdom of the change, and proponents and opponents both said further legal or procedural developments could affect implementation.
