Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Property topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate moves disposition bill for Utah State Developmental Center to third reading after sponsor outlines protections
Summary
Senate advanced first substitute SB 113 to third reading; bill gives state final say over sale/lease of Developmental Center property in American Fork, keeps proceeds dedicated to the center, and will add an independent board member and a one‑year planning extension for oversight input.
First substitute Senate Bill 113, addressing disposition of state property, water rights and related duties tied to the Utah State Developmental Center in American Fork, was moved to the Senate’s third reading calendar after a floor presentation and discussion.
Senator Buxton, sponsor of the bill, told colleagues the legislation clarifies that the state — not only the existing board — will have final authority over sales or long‑term leases of the center’s roughly 20 acres. He emphasized statutory protections that keep proceeds and income dedicated to the developmental center and said the bill extends the effective date by one year to allow the board to prepare a long‑range plan.
Buxton said he had met with board members and the sponsor will identify a third independent, non‑executive member to sit on a committee that will review proposals. The sponsor described the change as a fiduciary step to better manage a valuable asset whose proceeds should continue to benefit residents and services.
Senators asked clarifying questions about location (American Fork, not the Provo state hospital), intent to sell property and the process for identifying the independent board member. Senator Escamilla and others said constituent emails had raised concerns and pledged to watch amendments; Senator Kennedy supported moving the bill forward, saying long‑term protections for special‑needs residents are vital.
The Senate voted to move the first substitute to third reading by roll call (23 yea, 3 nay, 3 absent), and the sponsor said he would circle the bill on third reading until the additional independent member is identified and the board’s comments are received.
