Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Abortion Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House approves 18‑week limit on elective abortion after long, divisive debate
Summary
House substitute for HB 136 would bar elective abortions after 18 weeks' gestational age with specified exceptions; the measure passed 57–15 amid extensive debate over medical evidence, constitutional risk and potential litigation. Sponsors say exceptions remain; critics cite a constitutional memo and warn of legal costs and harms to women with late‑discovered fetal anomalies.
The Utah House of Representatives approved a substitute for House Bill 136 on Feb. 25, limiting elective abortions after 18 weeks gestational age and inserting legislative findings into the House Journal, passing the main bill 57–15 and a separate motion to spread intent language 57–16.
Representative Acton, sponsor of the measure, argued the bill narrows elective abortion after the gestational threshold while preserving statutory exceptions for life of the mother, permanent impairment and fatal fetal defects. "This is a reasonable bill that preserves a woman's right to choose for any reason, exceptions while adding an additional [limit]," Acton said on the floor.
Opponents raised constitutional concerns and potential litigation costs. Representative Miles and others cited a legislative constitutional memo filed in the record that warned HB 136 would likely be found unconstitutional unless its enforcement were delayed until changes in federal precedent. Representative Bailey Proven said historical experience shows restricting access increases risks to women and cautioned about health consequences.
Floor debate also focused on medical characterizations: members questioned how gestational age is calculated (by last menstrual period) and whether an 18‑week gestational threshold corresponds to fetal development stages cited by the sponsor. Representative Acton and supporters cited peer‑reviewed studies and asserted fetal stress responses before viability; critics and several members countered that viability remains the conventional statutory test and that many fatal fetal anomalies are not detectable until after 18 weeks.
Representative Briscoe questioned who drafted the proposed legislative intent language; the sponsor said the Alliance Defending Freedom prepared the intent draft and that legal counsel and others had contributed language. Representative Stoddard raised concerns about selected case citations in the intent language and urged accurate, contextualized quotations for any text placed in the Journal.
After debate, the House passed the substitute to HB 136, 57–15. Representative Acton also moved to spread the bill’s legislative findings and purpose into the House Journal; that motion passed on division 57–16. The bill and the intent language now travel to the Senate, and members noted the likelihood of constitutional challenge and associated costs.
