Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Air Quality topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House approves $2 million push to retrofit three high‑emitting freight switchers
Summary
After a lengthy floor debate about cost, enforceability and private railroad contributions, the House passed HB 98 (38–35) to provide $2 million in state funds leveraged with federal and private funds to retrofit three of Utah’s highest-emitting freight‑switcher locomotives.
The Utah House of Representatives on Feb. 14 narrowly approved a measure to fund upgrades to freight‑switcher locomotives that state air‑quality experts say are concentrated sources of local diesel pollution.
Rep. Andrew Handy, sponsor of House Bill 98, told colleagues the initiative targets a small number of the worst emitters among roughly 63 freight switchers operating in Utah rail yards and would use $2 million in state funds leveraged with federal Diesel Emissions Reduction Act dollars and a railroad contribution to rebuild three high‑emitting units. "There are 63 freight switchers in Utah," he said during floor remarks. "We can mitigate the pollution and the emissions coming from these freight switchers."
The bill’s sponsor and backers framed the proposal as a cost‑effective, measurable way to reduce NOx and fine‑particulate emissions in nonattainment areas. Handy cited a range of estimated control costs that the House heard from air‑quality analysis: "It's well within the range of emission reduction cost of $2.38 to $6,560 per ton for area source rules recently adopted by the Utah Air Quality Board," he said.
Opponents pressed whether the state should subsidize upgrades for large railroads and whether a $2 million appropriation would be protected against relocation of upgraded engines. Rep. Kristofferson and others asked what would stop a railroad from upgrading engines and then moving them out of state; the sponsor said enforceability provisions would be written into the contract and memorandum of agreement with the Division of Air Quality and DEQ.
Supporters stressed cost‑per‑ton metrics and the lack of state authority to compel cleaner switchers under federal preemption, arguing incentives are the practical option. Rep. Hawkes said the proposal "ranks as one of the best things we could do in terms of return on our investment as a state."
The House approved HB 98 on a close vote, 38–35. The bill will be forwarded to the Senate for further consideration.
Next steps: the Department of Environmental Quality will administer any enacted mitigation funds and negotiate agreements that, according to sponsors, will require the locomotives to remain in Utah to secure the air‑quality benefits.
