Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Nursing Accreditation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House adopts temporary extension, milestones for nursing program accreditation

Utah House of Representatives · March 4, 2020
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

S.B. 127 extends a nursing-program accreditation deadline for an institution in probation, adopts an amendment requiring site-visit scheduling and enrollment limits if milestones are missed, and passed the House 53'to'1.

Representative Musselman introduced S.B. 127 as a targeted extension to allow an institution that faced institutional probation to complete its final program accreditation site visit. He said the deadline already had been extended previously and that committee amendment had shortened the extension here to "a year and a half." Musselman framed the change as allowing the institution to complete the final steps toward full accreditation.

Representative Ward offered Amendment #3 to require interim milestones: by Nov. 30 the nursing site visit must be scheduled and the site visit conducted the following spring; if the institution fails those milestones it would not be allowed to enroll new students (though current students would be protected from being forced out). Ward said the amendment was designed to prevent repeated extensions without accountability. Musselman characterized the amendment as "friendly" and said he had worked with Ward and other stakeholders to craft language that accommodated parties.

Floor questions focused on the named institution (discussed in debate as Stevens Henninger College), its graduate placement rates and the fairness of repeated deadline extensions. Representative Hawkins asked whether the institution continued to graduate students during the accreditation delay; Ward and others confirmed it did and that current students would not be cut off. Critics argued repeated extensions set a bad precedent after multiple prior deadlines; supporters said the institution serves nontraditional students and that closing it could reduce nursing workforce throughput during a shortage.

Representative Musselman summarized that the bill does not change accreditation requirements or the requirement that graduates pass the NCLEX nursing exam. The House voted on the amended bill and S.B. 127 passed with a recorded tally of 53 yeas and 15 nays; it will return to the Senate for further consideration.