Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Resources topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves study update directing Division of Water Resources to refresh Green River cost estimates
Summary
The House passed a bill directing an update to a 2002 Green River study to produce current cost estimates for potential water diversion options tied to the Colorado River allocation. Sponsors said updated figures are needed for policy decisions; members debated whether existing audits were sufficient.
Get email alerts on the Water Resources topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative Ferri presented second substitute House Bill 328 to direct the Division of Water Resources to update cost estimates and other data tied to the Green River/Colorado River options first studied roughly two decades ago. Ferri said the original report had an addendum in 2003 and otherwise has not been updated; the bill asks the division to provide current cost estimates so legislators can make informed policy choices.
Members raised questions about whether a 2015 performance audit of Utah’s water‑needs projections or other more recent studies had been considered. Ferri said this bill targets the specific Green River study and does not preclude use of other studies; its purpose is to update the older cost estimates with current numbers. Representative Snyder and others urged that conservation remain a priority while updating development options.
Discussion probed scope: Representative Briscoe asked whether the update would cover all 16 alternatives identified in the original Green River report; the sponsor said the bill directs an update to cost estimates and current data, but the text determines the precise scope. Representative Waite and others referenced the 2015 audit and whether it should affect the decision to spend funds on another study.
Floor supporters stressed the need for current, localized data: “If we’re going to grow as a state…we need a full picture,” Representative Snyder said. Backers argued an updated, state‑specific cost study will allow the Legislature to compare conservation and development options with accurate numbers.
The House passed the substitute and will transmit the measure to the Senate for further consideration.
