Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Lead Testing Schools topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Utah House narrowly rejects bill requiring statewide school drinking-water testing

Utah House of Representatives · February 28, 2020
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A proposal to create a baseline lead-testing program for school drinking water and fund a one-time $2 million appropriation failed on the House floor 34-33 after extended debate about costs, coordination and remediation responsibilities.

Representative Kevin Handy brought the House floor a first substitute to House Bill 88 on Feb. 28 proposing statewide baseline testing of school drinking water outlets and a one-time $2,000,000 appropriation for testing costs and coordination. Handy said the measure would require public schools to test drinking fountains and other outlets through the end of calendar year 2023 and thereafter every five years, and that the Division of Drinking Water and local health departments would be partners in the work.

Why it mattered: Handy framed the bill as a public-health step to address lead exposure in children. He cited a 2017 voluntary study of Utah schools by the Division of Drinking Water in which "75% of our public schools participated, and 92% had detectable levels of lead," and reiterated that "there is no acceptable level of lead in water," language he attributed to CDC guidance. The bill sponsor said an individual test can cost about $25–$40 and that the requested $2 million would be a one-time state contribution to get a statewide baseline while federal grants and local district efforts supplement the work.

What supporters said: Supporters argued the bill fills gaps in data and readiness. Representative Waldrop urged colleagues to "support this wholeheartedly and make sure that we put appropriate resources to the study of this." Proponents emphasized local health department involvement, the Division of Drinking Water's existing grant work and examples of districts that had invested in their own testing equipment.

What opponents said: Opponents questioned whether state funds were necessary and whether the scope and coordination were clear. Representative Owens said, "we don't even know how big the problem is" and opposed committing state dollars without clearer evidence and coordination with available federal grants. Representative Musselman and others asked why testing would continue every five years after remediation, and Handy replied that summer stagnation and other factors mean ongoing checks are advisable.

Vote and next steps: After about 90 minutes of floor discussion and a series of questions about coordination, remediation and costs, the House voted on the first substitute for HB 88. The measure received 34 "yay" votes and 33 "nay" votes and therefore failed; the clerk recorded that the bill "fails to pass the house, and will be referred to staff for filing." Representative Handy said he would continue to seek ways to advance testing and funding.

Context and clarifications: Handy said the Division of Drinking Water had obtained federal grants totaling nearly $500,000 that districts could access, and that the $2 million requested in the substitute was a one-time, negotiated amount to supplement available federal funding and provide testing for districts without access to adequate resources. The bill applied as a mandate for public elementary and secondary schools and left participation optional for private schools, a negotiation point Handy described as necessary to secure agreement and move the item forward.

Ending: The failure of HB 88 leaves Utah without a new, statewide statutory requirement for school drinking water testing; supporters signaled they would continue coordination with public-health agencies and explore funding and policy options.