Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Free Speech topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Republican-backed bill to limit university intervention on student speech passes House after heated debate
Summary
House Bill 132, invoking the Davis v. Monroe standard for student‑on‑student speech and creating a private right of action against public institutions, passed the House 39–31 after extended debate about federal Title IX guidance, waiver of immunity and attorney‑fee provisions.
After prolonged debate, the Utah House on Feb. 26 approved House Bill 132, a measure that would narrow circumstances in which public higher‑education institutions can restrict student speech and creates a private right of action for students whose speech rights are violated.
Representative Coleman, sponsor, said the bill adopts the Supreme Court standard set in Davis v. Monroe Board of Education to distinguish harassment from constitutionally protected student speech and that the change will give clarity to institutions and students.
Opponents raised concerns that the bill could conflict with pending federal guidance under Title IX, expose public institutions to litigation by waiving sovereign immunity and create a financially one‑sided litigation environment because plaintiffs could collect attorney fees while institutions could not recover fees from unsuccessful claims. Representative Kwan and Representative Waldrop urged caution and said the state should wait for the final federal determination before imposing state-level private rights of action.
Supporters argued the bill protects free speech on campus and prevents overbroad administrative restrictions driven by prior federal interpretations. Representative Coleman said the measure is consistent with Supreme Court precedent and would protect students' free speech rights.
A motion to cut off debate failed earlier in the day and floor votes were divided; House passage was recorded as 39–31. The bill will proceed to the Senate.
