Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rare Earths topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House backs resolution promoting rare-earth mineral development amid environmental and tribal concerns
Summary
The House passed SCR 3 recognizing Utah's significance for critical minerals, 57–10. Supporters framed the resolution as bolstering national security and economic development; some members raised concerns about uranium processing and tribal objections at the White Mesa Mill.
The Utah House on Feb. 1 approved a concurrent resolution (SCR 3) recognizing the state's reserves of critical minerals and urging federal cooperation on processing and national-security needs, passing 57 yeas to 10 nays.
Representative Albrecht, sponsor of the resolution, said the measure recognizes Utah “as an essential source for critical minerals” and noted the state is known to have 28 of the 35 federally listed critical minerals. “We wanna work closely with our federal agencies, to promote national security,” Albrecht said.
Supporters, including Representative Ivory, tied mineral development to renewable-energy goals and national-security supply chains. “If you like renewable energy, you should love mining,” Ivory said, warning that “the rare earth elements in the world are controlled 90% by China.”
Opponents and questioners raised environmental and tribal concerns. Representative Briscoe asked about Ute Mountain Ute tribal concerns regarding the White Mesa Uranium Mill; members discussed local capacity to process ore and noted that some materials have been sent overseas for final processing. Representative Lyman cited a local mill near Blanding that he said could process rare earths domestically.
Representative Stratham and others framed the resolution as a jobs and revenue opportunity for education funding and state infrastructure, while acknowledging potential land-use tensions around wilderness and study areas.
After discussion and a summation from the sponsor, the House approved SCR 3, returning the resolution to the Senate. The record shows 57 yeas and 10 nays; the sponsor noted the governor referenced the resolution in the state address.
