Get email alerts on the Blockchain topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves optional 'sheriff's node' for some blockchains amid split views on immutability
Summary
Lawmakers passed Senate Bill 160 allowing blockchain implementations to optionally include a court‑ordered reversible element (a 'sheriff's node') that would let the attorney general reverse transactions on a specific node with a court order. Sponsors called it a consumer‑protection option; opponents said it is antithetical to blockchain’s immutable design. (Passed 65–6.)
Representative Tusher (moving to uncircle the bill) told the House that first substitute Senate Bill 160 was drafted by the blockchain and digital innovation task force and would let blockchains optionally include a reversible mechanism for fraud or mistake when authorized by a court and exercised by the attorney general.
Tusher said the design — described in floor remarks as a ‘‘sheriff's node’’ — is optional and intended to ‘‘dramatically cut down on fraud and theft’’ for blockchains that choose to adopt the technology. He emphasized the provision does not apply to blockchains that do not opt into the node.
Representative Lyman spoke in opposition, calling the sheriff's node ‘‘contrary’’ and ‘‘antithetical to blockchain technology itself’’ and questioned why Utah would regulate into a decentralized, global system. Other members spoke in favor, saying the bill is a prudent, optional tool to protect consumers while keeping the choice with blockchain designers.
After floor debate, the House approved the first substitute by roll call; the transcript records the passage as 65 yes and 6 no votes. The bill will be returned to the Senate for the president's signature.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
