Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Tax Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House approves across‑the‑board income tax cut, expands credits for seniors and families
Summary
The House passed First Substitute House Bill 54 on Feb. 22, 2023, cutting the state income tax rate from 4.85% to 4.65%, raising Social Security tax‑credit thresholds and increasing the earned income tax credit. Supporters say new revenue funds the cuts; opponents warned about distributional effects. The bill passed 65–7 and will go to the Senate.
Get email alerts on the State Tax Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah House of Representatives on Feb. 22 passed First Substitute House Bill 54, a package of tax changes that reduces the state individual and corporate income tax rate from 4.85% to 4.65% and expands several credits benefiting seniors and families. Representative Steve Eliason, the bill sponsor, told colleagues the rate cut amounts to “about a $380,000,000 tax cut” and that the measure also raises the Social Security tax credit thresholds, creates a double dependent exemption for the first year of a child’s life, and increases the state earned income tax credit from 15% to 20% of the federal credit.
Eliason said the package is “an income tax cut for all Utahns” and argued the changes are funded from new revenue generated by the state’s strong economy, not by reductions to education or social services. He described the Social Security threshold changes as an ongoing $16,600,000 benefit and the increase to the earned income tax credit as about $1,200,000 in fiscal impact.
Democrats raised distributional concerns. Representative Briscoe acknowledged parts of the bill he supported but said the income tax cut portion was his primary objection, arguing wealthier taxpayers receive larger dollar benefits. He cited decile analysis showing that higher earners receive larger absolute cuts and suggested the top 1% have seen outsized gains from prior federal tax cuts. Supporters including Representatives Brammer and Brammer (floor remarks) defended the policy as pro‑growth tax relief that they said would increase payrolls and economic activity.
After floor debate and summations, the House voted to pass the bill 65–7. The bill will be transmitted to the Senate for further consideration. The sponsor said the bill’s tax‑cut provisions would not reduce constitutionally protected education funding and would be implemented using newly available revenue sources.
