Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legal Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission authorizes legal steps, executive sessions and outside opinions on several matters
Summary
County counselor requested and the commission approved executive sessions and motions authorizing (1) filing a sanitation‑rule petition against a private individual, (2) withdrawing certain litigation to reassign to new counsel, and (3) seeking outside legal opinions about solar panel agreements and authorizing counsel to negotiate an MOU with Freeman.
Get email alerts on the Legal Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
During the Nov. 14 meeting the county counselor, Justin Mix, requested multiple executive sessions and motions to permit immediate legal steps relating to pending matters.
Mix asked for motions to allow filing a petition alleging a violation of county sanitation rules; the commission approved the motion to file within the next three to four business days. "I ask that, a motion be given to the commissioners with regards to a petition to file with a violation of our KDHD's rules on sanitation," Mix stated and a formal motion to file passed by voice vote.
Commissioners also approved motions to withdraw a recently filed judgment (noted as $13,000 plus $2,000 in attorney fees) so a new county counselor can assume responsibility in the new year. The commission authorized seeking third, fourth and fifth impartial legal opinions about the legality of agreements with solar companies (questions included whether the county, as an unzoned jurisdiction, could have stopped installations and the legal meaning of being "unzoned").
Separately, commissioners authorized the county counselor to negotiate changes in a memorandum of understanding with Freeman concerning sales tax funds and gave Commissioner Weisenhunt authority to interact with Freeman on emergency room funding language.
Why it matters: The motions authorize immediate legal filings and broader legal review of longstanding contractual and land‑use concerns; they also transfer certain litigation responsibilities and create a path for negotiation on a county sales‑tax MOU. The actions involved matters that may have financial, legal and reputational consequences for the county.

