Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety Services topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Tow operators press Bourbon County over proposed sheriff contract requiring workers’ comp

Bourbon County Board of Commissioners · September 10, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Local tow operators told commissioners a pending sheriff’s towing contract would force sole proprietors to carry workers’ compensation and raised liability, rotation, and indemnity concerns; county counsel said the issue is legally complex and recommended written submissions and further review.

Several local tow operators used the public-comment period to warn commissioners about language in a forthcoming sheriff’s towing contract that would require sole proprietors to carry workers’ compensation insurance.

Casey Johnson and Greg Post, among others, told the board they operate small, family or single‑owner towing businesses and said Kansas law or practice exempts sole proprietors in some circumstances from workers’ compensation coverage for themselves. They said requiring new coverage could remove independent operators from the county call rotation and impose substantial costs.

County counselor Justin Meek and other commissioners acknowledged the issue is complex and characterized it as a gray area of law and procurement practice. Counsel recommended that individuals submit written concerns to the sheriff and the commission and cautioned that if disputes alleging loss or breach of contract arise, litigation could follow and the county might be drawn into it.

Speakers also discussed call-rotation mechanics, indemnity provisions in the contract (hold‑harmless language for dispatch/county), and the practical effect of dispatch selecting the next available wrecker on liability chains. Commissioners said they would review the contract text, request written statements if litigation appears likely, and consider whether the commission should be involved in renegotiation or oversight of the contract process.

No formal change to the sheriff’s contracting authority was made at the meeting; commissioners suggested follow‑up with the sheriff’s office and staff review to clarify who sets contract terms and whether written state guidance can be obtained.