Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mbta Compliance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board update spotlights MBTA‑communities compliance, ADU bylaw changes and parkway planning
Summary
Planning Board Chair Michael Feck told the Select Board Mansfield submitted its MBTA Communities compliance application and expects notice by Nov. 4; the board is prioritizing ADU bylaw changes to comply with state law and is preparing for parkway design and possible land swaps tied to MBTA station redevelopment.
Michael Feck, chair of the Planning Board, briefed the Select Board on Sept. 4 about the board’s work on MBTA Communities compliance, zoning amendments and large-scale infrastructure planning connected to the Mansfield Station Revitalization Overlay District.
Feck said the town has submitted a compliance application and expects a state determination by Nov. 4. “That’s really been the board’s main focus over the past two years,” he said, noting the attorney general’s office previously approved phases of the Mansfield Station overlay district.
Feck emphasized that recent state housing legislation includes measures that will require many towns to allow accessory dwelling units (ADUs) by right in single‑family zones. “One of them being, in single family housing zones having to allow ADUs by right,” he said; Feck warned Mansfield’s current ADU bylaw — which requires special permits, age or size conditions and other limitations — will conflict with the state standard effective Feb. 4 and that a subcommittee is working on a bylaw update.
The Planning Board has also formed subcommittees to evaluate starter‑home or smart‑growth overlay districts, dimensional‑standards changes to reduce nonconformity across many pre‑existing lots, and where duplexes or conversions might be appropriate. Feck said more than 80% of existing homes are on pre‑existing nonconforming lots and mapping adjustments could bring many into compliance without new subdivision.
Feck described parkway planning linked to MBTA efforts as a separate, town‑led design process that may require land swaps, drainage agreements and development agreements among private landowners, MBTA and the town. He urged early Select Board involvement to evaluate road layouts and development‑agreement terms before site‑specific projects are submitted for planning review.
Board members raised questions about traffic analysis and timing. Select Board member Walter asked, “Are you ever gonna get a traffic study?” Raposa and Feck said traffic counts and a conceptual level‑of‑service analysis are in progress and the engineering consultant will present results at the forum scheduled for Sept. 25; they also said future site‑specific projects will need their own traffic studies.
The Planning Board also previewed a retail firearms zoning bylaw under consideration that would regulate locations for gun sales; Raposa said the intent is location regulation rather than a ban and members noted the topic could be contentious in town meeting deliberations.
Next steps: Planning staff and the Planning Board will continue ADU bylaw drafting, hold the next public forum on Sept. 25 to present traffic analysis and other technical results, and engage the Select Board as parkway design and development agreements come into focus.
