Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Charter Revision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Human Services Commission discusses charter revisions and proposal to merge disability and aging commissions
Summary
Members reviewed proposed charter changes, including combining the Commission on Disabilities with the Human Services Commission into an expanded Commission on Aging and Disabilities, and debated whether youth services and veterans issues would remain properly represented; no charter change was adopted and further review and a draft letter to the first selectman were planned.
The Fairfield Human Services Commission spent a substantial portion of its meeting reviewing possible charter revisions, including a departmental suggestion to merge the Commission on Disabilities with the Human Services Commission into a proposed Commission on Aging and Disabilities.
A presenter from the department said the idea was intended to consolidate overlapping work and improve quorum and participation: "I submitted from the department, an idea to combine the commission on disabilities with the human services commission under Commission on Aging and Disabilities because we struggle to have forms for aging," a member said during discussion. Commissioners raised concerns that renaming or rechartering could narrow the commission's remit and potentially reduce attention to youth services and veterans' issues.
Members emphasized that charter changes require a townwide election to take effect and cannot be enacted unilaterally by the commission. Commissioners agreed to keep charter revisions on future agendas, invited colleagues to review the town website for public comments and to refine language for any proposal that would be sent forward.
The commission also discussed an administrative route: several members said they supported doing some work administratively and sending a formal letter to the first selectman's office to recommend placement or oversight of youth services if the commission concluded that would improve service delivery. Loretta and others were identified as working on a draft letter to be circulated to the commission and copied to the first selectman's office for consideration.
No formal vote to change the charter was taken; the group resolved to continue deliberations, gather comment and, if the commission supports it, submit recommendations as part of the public comment process before the charter window closes.
