Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Snowbasin Structure Consents topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ogden Valley commission approves consent item for Snowbasin structure after brief safety questions

Ogden Valley Planning Commission · August 7, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve a consent item allowing a structure to be sited near Snowbasin; a commissioner asked whether the county typically requires applicants to include safety-language for ski-area structures, and legal counsel said such a condition could be considered but that applicant responsibility is typical.

The Ogden Valley Planning Commission voted Aug. 6 to approve a consent item related to a structure to be sited near Snowbasin, after a brief discussion about whether the county generally requires applicants to include language protecting the public.

A commissioner asked legal counsel whether the county typically inserts language requiring an applicant to 'protect the public from collision' when approving a building in a ski area, citing a past incident in which a skier ran into a pole and was killed. Legal counsel (Corland) replied that adding such a condition "is certainly something that could be considered as an additional condition," and said county liability would generally not be expected; he emphasized the applicant's responsibility for safety decisions.

Because the agenda item was labeled as a meeting item rather than a work session item, counsel advised the commission it could legally take a vote. The chair asked whether anyone wished to move the item from consent to the regular agenda; with no motion to do so, the commission proceeded and the chair summarized the vote as unanimous.

The commission took no additional conditions on the record at the Aug. 6 meeting. There was no public comment on non-agenda items that evening, and the commission then moved on to other business.