Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ebikes And Trails Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oakley council narrows proposed trails ordinance to allow Class 1–2 e-bikes, limits motorized vehicles; sends ordinance back for further reading
Summary
The council discussed a third-reading ordinance that would prohibit motorized vehicles on trails and debated how to treat e-bikes by class, enforcement practicality and signage; members voted to approve the third reading with changes and will review a revised draft at a subsequent work session.
Oakley council reviewed a proposed ordinance (third reading) intended to prohibit motorized vehicles on trails and public pathways and spent substantial time debating how the rule should treat different classes of electric bicycles.
Staff explained the ordinance is intended to prevent motorcycles and off-road motorized vehicles from using multiuse trails. Councilmembers raised practical enforcement concerns and liability issues if motorized vehicles injured other users or horses. The discussion focused on technical distinctions between e-bike classes and on-age exceptions: several members urged allowing Class 1 and Class 2 e-bikes on single-track trails while prohibiting Class 3 except for riders aged 55 and older.
Councilmembers also proposed removing age-based subsections that would otherwise complicate enforcement, suggesting a simpler, universal statement allowing Class 1 and 2 on single-track and prohibiting motorized dirt bikes and non-class devices. Members recommended site-specific restrictions (e.g., skate park, bike park), clearer definitions in the ordinance text, and use of signage (including QR codes linking to full rules) to inform trail users. Several speakers noted enforcement would likely fall to the Summit County Sheriff’s Department, and one councilmember suggested giving staff ticketing authority for certain locations.
After discussion, a motion to approve the third reading with changes was made (mover identified as Tom; seconded by Dave) and passed by voice vote. The council agreed the item will return for a fourth reading and may be refined at a work session to finalize class definitions, site-specific rules and signage plans.
