Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wage Study topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price City councilors weigh a $35,000 salary study, opt for narrower RFP and internal alternatives
Summary
Councilors debated a proposed $35,000 salary-evaluation contract and largely agreed to narrow the scope, prepare an RFP, and build an internal pay-projection chart rather than immediately approving the full consultant bid.
Price City councilors spent a large portion of the workshop discussing whether to commission a comprehensive salary-evaluation study priced at about $35,000 and how to proceed without creating unfunded long-term obligations. Speaker 7 introduced the proposal for an outside evaluation; several council participants questioned scope and cost.
"This is $35,000 that's not budgeted," Speaker 7 said, calling attention to the size of the proposed contract. Speaker 3 reminded the group of procurement rules: "anything over $8,000, the estimated cost requires sealed bids," noting professional services exceptions only apply when an existing contract is in place.
Participants recalled smaller, prior studies — "Last time we did that, I think it was about $12,000," Speaker 3 said — and debated whether the city needs a full, citywide analysis or a narrower study targeted at specific job classes. Several councilors proposed a lower-cost internal alternative: an officer-assembled spreadsheet listing current pay and projected pay year-to-year.
Speaker 2 urged a pragmatic approach: "What our next steps would be is not put this on the back burner, but have a couple of people sit down and say these are the things we want to know in a wage study," and recommended preparing a narrowly scoped RFP. He added that an RFP "could probably have an RFP ready...before the end of the year."
Council discussion repeatedly flagged budget constraints and the risk that an expansive study could create political pressure to grant uniform raises. Speaker 3 cautioned that if a study recommended a citywide 10% increase, implementing that without budget clearance would be difficult. To limit that risk, the council directed staff and a small working group to draft a narrower scope, seek proposals, and return any contract award to the full council for approval.
No formal motion or vote was taken during the workshop; the group treated the outcome as a staff direction to prepare scope language for an RFP and to explore lower-cost analytical options.
Next steps: staff will draft a narrowly scoped RFP, identify a small working group to refine the scope, and return contract selection and any formal procurement to the council for approval.
