Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Affordable Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Summit council backs NJILGA amendments to Fair Housing Act after on‑the‑floor edits
Summary
Council voted to support proposed amendments to the state Fair Housing Act drafted by the New Jersey Institute of Local Government Attorneys after amending out a colorful line and hearing expert testimony that the changes would tether obligations to new construction starts and ease litigation burdens.
Summit Common Council unanimously adopted a resolution supporting amendments to the New Jersey Fair Housing Act proposed by the New Jersey Institute of Local Government Attorneys (NJILGA), after on‑the‑floor edits and extended discussion about feasibility and local consequences.
Councilmembers and outside counsel described the March amendments as producing very large, untethered municipal obligations under the prior formula; the NJILGA proposal seeks to tie obligations to actual housing starts and make targets more achievable to reduce litigation and promote voluntary compliance. Jeff Serenian, who participated in drafting the institute’s recommended language, explained the intent was to make municipal affordable‑housing obligations “tethered to reality” and thereby avoid unrealistic numerical targets that spark lengthy litigation.
Council amended the draft by striking a jocular line that referenced “turning the Garden State into the Garden apartment state” after members said the phrasing risked alienating residents who already live in apartments. Debate centered on whether the change would meaningfully aid municipalities (many councilmembers said it would reduce litigation exposure and produce more achievable targets) and on the timing of sending the municipal expression of support to the legislature.
What it means: The council’s endorsement adds Summit to a growing list of municipalities urging the Legislature to adopt NJILGA’s proposed approach. Supporters argued the amendment would reduce the local fiscal burden of prolonged litigation and produce more realistic, implementable affordable‑housing obligations; some members emphasized the continuing need to rehab existing affordable units and to ensure policies also encourage homeownership where practicable.
Next steps: The council sent the amended resolution as an expression of support and asked staff and counsel to coordinate any follow‑up advocacy with regional partners and the League of Municipalities.
