Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Summit residents press council over Tatlock lights and disputed DCP email as field-use study awaits release

Summit Common Council · December 4, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Residents voiced support and concern over proposed Tatlock field lights and criticized a Department of Community Programs email that they say prematurely announced study conclusions; council members pledged to post the field-study presentation and continue public engagement at a Middle School meeting.

Residents and council members clashed over proposed athletic-field lights at Tatlock and a Department of Community Programs (DCP) email that residents said gave premature conclusions about a field-use study. The dispute dominated public comment and council discussion at the Dec. 10 Summit Common Council meeting.

Several residents urged the council to move carefully. "They should not have stated a conclusion on it because it's not ready," resident Carlos Hernandez said, referring to a DCP email that used department graphics and described the study as showing "no problem" before the final report was posted. Hernandez thanked the council for a quick clarification but asked what steps would be taken to prevent similar communications in the future and whether the DCP would send the council president's statement by email to the DCP mailing list.

Other speakers framed the issue around community needs and fairness. Jocelyn Modesto, who lives on Butler Parkway, said turfing more fields elsewhere could reduce pressure on Tatlock and questioned why study findings had been circulated before the community had access to the underlying report. "They've had months to work on this report," Modesto said, adding that constituents deserve the information in time to prepare for tomorrow's meeting.

Supporters of lights argued they would expand field availability for many users. "Lights at Tatlock will not just benefit football and lacrosse," said Kelly Ika Valley, a resident and youth sports coach, urging the council to adopt usage and parking rules (limits on PA use, one-side parking enforcement on Butler Parkway and scheduling buffers) to mitigate neighborhood impacts. Valley noted the town's growing year-round sports programs and said added lighted hours would benefit families and evening activity.

Council members acknowledged the communication lapse and promised greater transparency. Councilman Menninger and others said a presentation of the field-use study would be posted to the city's website; Councilman Menninger said the presentation "will be coming out tonight" so residents could review it before the scheduled informational session. Council members repeatedly characterized the Tatlock matter as a community issue rather than a partisan one and urged residents to attend the informational session and upcoming public engagements.

Next steps: the Department of Community Programs is scheduled to present field findings at a public informational session at the Middle School tomorrow at 7:15 p.m., and several council members said they intend to schedule additional town-hall–style conversations in January to continue community engagement.