Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Quality topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Land and Water Conservation department reports groundwater study: some wells exceed arsenic standard; nitrate screening events announced

Jefferson County Board of Supervisors · May 15, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Director Patricia Cicero briefed the board on the department's annual work including a UW–Stevens Point groundwater study that found about 7% of sampled wells exceeded a human-health arsenic standard, plus planned nitrate screening events and an online dashboard forthcoming in June.

Patricia Cicero, director of the Land and Water Conservation Department, presented the department’s annual report May 21, outlining staffing, programs and recent groundwater sampling results conducted in partnership with UW–Stevens Point.

Cicero said the office runs major programs including a land and water resources management plan and a 'Bridal Preservation' program that had roughly 600 participants covering more than 100,000 acres. She described a UW–Stevens Point–partnered groundwater sampling effort that recruited well owners, analyzed samples and produced preliminary findings: areas of the county have naturally occurring arsenic and about 7% of the wells sampled exceeded the human-health standard for arsenic. Cicero emphasized available treatments and the department’s outreach plans, including nitrate screening opportunities at a Health Department open house on June 22 and at the county fair July 10–12. She said a final study report and an online dashboard would be published in June.

Board members asked about a Lake Ripley management-district study; Cicero and a Lake Ripley representative clarified that the Lake Ripley Management District conducted that evaluation under a DNR grant and that the county was not the primary author of that particular study.