Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Affordable Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council debates deed restrictions and COA obligations for 56 Elliott Place group-home conversion
Summary
Council reviewed a conversion at 56 Elliott Place to a five-bedroom group home and discussed deed restrictions, state Department of Community Affairs rules, COA/COAH obligations and whether restrictions can be extended beyond the typical 30-year term.
A zoning and planning item on June 24 asked the council to consider a conversion at 56 Elliott Place from a four-bedroom to a five-bedroom group home, which would be deed-restricted to meet affordable-housing obligations.
Council members sought details about ownership (Township ownership vs. private owner), the duration of deed restrictions (the meeting referenced common 30-year reversionary terms and noted some DCA guidance allowing shorter periods in high-poverty tracts) and whether the township could negotiate permanent deed restrictions or require a repayment clause if public funds were used. The attorney explained that reversionary terms are permissible under state law and that the township can negotiate longer deed restrictions or require repayment terms, but that some provisions are set by state programs and Department of Community Affairs rules.
Council members also discussed process: resolution to refer the application to the planning board followed by ordinance adoption at a later meeting. Council members asked to see conversion plans that show how the fifth bedroom is being added and whether the application meets floor-area-ratio and other zoning controls.
Why it matters: the item implicates affordable-housing obligations (COA/COAH) and long-term land-use outcomes; deed restriction terms affect whether a unit remains affordable decades later. Council asked for clarity on ownership, deed restriction length, and compliance with township FAR and zoning prior to final ordinance action.
