Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Fields Turf topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents and field stewards press Concord to weigh turf replacement and environmental concerns at Doug White fields
Summary
At an Oct. 28 Climate Action Committee meeting, dozens of residents and field stewards urged the town to consider both turf and natural-grass options for Doug White fields; speakers debated equity, PFAS and disposal costs, private funding and whether the committee has decision authority.
Dozens of residents and representatives of Friends of CC Plainfields pressed the Town of Concord’s Climate Action Committee on Oct. 28 to ensure environmental, health and equity impacts are studied before any decision about replacing the Doug White athletic fields.
Eric Jarnryd, treasurer of Friends of CC Plainfields, told the committee the volunteers have maintained the fields for roughly 18 years and argued the fields’ heavy use—about 4,000 youth-athlete sessions a year—makes natural grass impractical. “Our commitment is to replace turf with turf,” Jarnryd said, adding his group will share an April EPA/CBC study they said finds no greater exposure for athletes using crumb rubber than in other everyday circumstances.
Several parents and youth-sports organizers countered with equity and health concerns. Elizabeth Leonard, calling herself a “proud soccer mom,” said the fields provide affordable, high-capacity space for town-based clubs and warned that losing capacity for play would push families to travel farther and pay more. Other speakers, including a representative identifying with Concord Green, cited recent findings about PFAS and the limited U.S. capacity to recycle or accept end-of-life artificial turf, and argued lifecycle disposal costs and potential watershed impacts must factor into any town decision.
Dennis Morgan, a Concord resident, told the committee that Friends of CC Plainfields has approximately $1,500,000 in a fund intended to cover removal and replacement of the turf and said that, if the town unilaterally required a grass replacement, some or all of those funds could be unavailable for that purpose. Morgan also referenced an 11‑page EPA study from April that he said found no evidence of adverse health effects from turf compared to grass.
Coaches and program leaders offered competing views on playability and safety. Mark Thomas, director of coaching for local youth soccer, said turf enables the busy community schedule—weekday evenings and long weekend blocks—and warned that switching to grass could reduce program capacity. Other residents raised concerns about loose rubber infill pellets that blow off fields into stormwater basins and about higher surface temperatures on turf fields.
Committee chair and staff repeatedly clarified that the Climate Action Committee is an advisory body and will not make the final decision; the town manager and select board will consider the results of a planned assessment. The committee said it has requested a balanced study and secured a meeting with town management to review options and the process; the select board has allocated $100,000 for an assessment of options at the field.
Next steps: the committee will meet with town management to discuss process and stakeholders; members and residents were encouraged to submit letters to the town manager and select board to ensure their views are recorded.
