Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Setback Variance Front Yard topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

ADR praises design at 200 Lagunitas Road but questions need for setback variances

Ross Advisory Design Review (ADR) · November 25, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The ADR praised the landscape and driveway improvements proposed at 200 Lagunitas Road, including a front-yard pool and widened fire-access gate, but members said the application does not clearly demonstrate the hardship needed to justify variances for patios and an outdoor kitchen placed in setback areas.

Ross’s Advisory Design Review reviewed proposed landscape renovations at 200 Lagunitas Road on Nov. 19 and commended the overall design while questioning whether the record supports setback variances for patios and an outdoor kitchen.

Presenter Elaine (Landscape Architecture) described widening the driveway gate to 16 feet to meet fire-access requirements, widening the motor court, placing the pool just outside a 25-foot setback line, and adding permeable pavers and a bioretention area to offset impervious surface. She told the ADR the design minimizes additional impervious area and that the team had shown the plan to neighbors, who did not object to the barbecue location.

ADR members praised the aesthetic and practical aspects: one member called the design "beautiful" and said the driveway and gate improvements were appropriate for fire access. However, multiple members said the lot’s generous buildable area and level topography undermined the case for variances. Members suggested shrinking or removing patio areas and the outdoor kitchen in setback zones and asked whether neighbor consent could be documented in writing. One member asked whether existing stone gate pillars would need to be removed for fire-department access and suggested reusing similar stonework if removal is required.

Staff reported that the applicant is minimizing the project’s impervious-surface increase by using permeable pavers and a bioretention corner and stated the plan reduces impervious area by about 664 square feet. ADR members recommended revisions to reduce the amount of activity placed in setback areas; staff will include ADR comments in the Council packet for any variance request.

Next steps: Staff will forward ADR comments and the applicant may revise plans before seeking Town Council action on any required variances.