Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Comprehensive Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Yarmouth planning board narrows LCP structure and sets hybrid public engagement for January
Summary
The Planning Board reviewed two table-of-contents options for the Town of Yarmouth's Local Comprehensive Plan, endorsed following Cape Cod Commission guidance while retaining town vision-plan elements, and directed staff and consultants to plan a hybrid public engagement session (primary and backup dates proposed for late January).
The Town of Yarmouth Planning Board on Nov. 6 focused its meeting on structuring the town's Local Comprehensive Plan and planning an intensive public engagement meeting for January.
Chair Joanne Crowley opened the discussion by introducing BSC Group representatives and Adam Duchenneault, and said materials from the Cape Cod Commission and the town's vision plan were included in the board packet. Town planner Kathy Williams told the board two table-of-contents approaches were in the packet: one that preserves the town's vision-plan groupings and one that follows the Cape Cod Commission's chapter wording, which places housing in a standalone chapter.
Jeff, a BSC Group consultant, told the board the second outline mirrors the Commission's template and is commonly used by communities that have a recent Housing Production Plan. "We're at a good stage to have this kind of discussion," he said, arguing that using the Commission's structure can simplify review while leaving room to highlight town-specific priorities.
Board members pressed for clarity on housing and coastal resiliency placement. A board member asked why housing had been pulled into its own chapter in one version; the consultant said the housing chapter would address affordable and market-rate housing, short-term rentals, and workforce housing rather than duplicating the town's Housing Production Plan. Several members asked that economic issues be emphasized; the consultant said the economy would be tracked and given distinct discussion points within the proposed chapter structure.
On public engagement, the board discussed options for an intensive January session aimed at raising awareness and gathering prioritized goals and action ideas. Kathy Williams and the consultant outlined a simultaneous hybrid format (in-person plus Zoom) with facilitated breakout groups and built-in polling. The consultant recommended holding a single synchronous hybrid session rather than separate in-person and online meetings to reduce confusion and staff time.
The board and consultants discussed logistics and outreach: using the hearing room's hybrid technology if capacity allowed, mailing/postcards, school communications (translated materials), town meeting handouts, and online notices to reach families and residents who did not attend the September open house. The consultant proposed three potential dates: Jan. 22, Jan. 29 and Feb. 5, and recommended designating a primary date plus a backup in case of weather.
The board was told BSC Group plans to provide the Planning Board a draft of existing conditions, key issues and community goals by mid-December for review ahead of the January engagement. That draft is intended to let board members confirm priorities and refine breakout questions before the public session.
Next steps: the board will confirm a primary and backup date for the January engagement, staff will finalize outreach materials, and consultants will submit the mid-December draft as promised. The Planning Board will review that draft at its December meeting and refine the engagement format and facilitated questions based on board feedback.
