Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislative Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Maine lawmaker urges end to ‘concept drafts’; House votes to send proposal to Joint Rules Committee
Summary
Representative Smith introduced a joint order to eliminate the use of "concept drafts," saying they reduce transparency and shortchange public input. Representative Moonen moved to refer the order to the Joint Select Committee on Joint Rules; the House approved the referral by roll call, 72–66.
Representative Smith (Palermo) opened debate by calling for the legislature to eliminate "concept drafts," arguing that the practice undermines transparency and prevents meaningful public participation. "Take, for instance, last session when legislation was passed without language even being available," Smith said, calling the use of concept drafts a "tragedy of government transparency." Smith urged repeal of the practice so constituents can have advance notice and meaningful opportunity to weigh in.
Representative Sara Moonen (Portland) moved that the joint order be referred to the Joint Select Committee on Joint Rules and asked colleagues to allow the committee's recently adopted, unanimous restrictions on concept drafts time to work. Moonen said the joint rules committee had recommended deadlines requiring language to be available in advance of public hearings and an automatic kill for concept drafts that fail to meet those deadlines. "It was a strong first step," Moonen said, and urged the House to let the committee process continue.
Representative Greenwood requested a roll-call vote on the motion to refer. The chair ordered the roll call; after votes were tallied the chair announced, "72 having voted in the affirmative, 66 in the negative. The motion prevails." The referral sends the joint order to the Joint Rules Committee for further consideration rather than enacting an immediate prohibition on concept drafts.
The debate focused on balancing quick legislative flexibility against the public's ability to review and respond to bill language. Smith framed the issue as one of trust and transparency: "The people we represent have no clue what we're doing when the concept drafts are used." Moonen acknowledged the transparency concerns but said the committee's previously agreed-upon restrictions are meant to address those problems while allowing time for further rulemaking.
Next steps: the Joint Select Committee on Joint Rules will schedule further consideration of the joint order and any rule changes. No immediate change to the legislative rules was adopted on the floor; the House's vote was to refer the matter to the committee.
