Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Works topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council weighs costs and community impacts of green waste burn pit; residents raise health concerns
Summary
Public Works told council that burning collected green waste two days per year is the most cost-effective option; council discussed chipping and hauling alternatives, and several residents described lingering smoke, possible health effects and quality-of-life impacts for nearby homes.
City staff and Public Works presented options Oct. 22 for managing the North Ogden greenways facility, commonly known as the burn pit. Public Works assistant/manager David Espinosa said the city has used burning for more than a decade as a cost-effective way to process annual green waste. Alternatives — purchasing a large chipper (capital cost previously estimated at more than $400,000) or hiring contractors to chip what the city collects (historical contractor costs in the range of $12,000–$25,000 per event) — would dramatically increase operating costs and could require hauling off a substantial fraction of processed material.
Espinosa said the city follows state and federal air-quality and safety regulations for the burning operation; staff described fire-suppression measures and oversight during burn events. Council members noted the service’s value (about $12,000 in punch-pass revenue and free disposal service for residents) but acknowledged neighborhood impacts, including odor and smoldering that can last beyond the two designated burn days.
During public comment, resident Randy Edmonds—who lives a block from the facility—said smoke and smoldering often last multiple days and saturate homes and fabrics, raising health and quality-of-life concerns. Edmonds said he was willing to pay more for chipping rather than tolerate repeated smoke exposure.
Council discussed trade-offs: continuing the burn pit concentrates cost savings for the broader community but imposes a recurrent nuisance on nearby residents; chipping or hauling may ameliorate local impacts but would raise service prices and require additional hauling or disposal. No final policy change was adopted Oct. 22; staff will continue to operate the facility under existing practices while the council monitors complaints and considers future options.
Next steps: staff will track private complaints and usage, and council members indicated they will revisit the topic if resident concerns escalate or if budget trade-offs make chipping or contracted chipping more feasible.
