Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Probation Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee passes bill clarifying when probation begins; defenders urge caution over written-rule requirements
Summary
HB1233 declares probation starts when a judge pronounces sentence or when a written sentencing order is entered, whichever occurs first. Supporters said it fixes a gap flagged by a state supreme-court reversal; defense attorneys warned the bill does not address separate jurisprudence requiring written probation rules before revocation.
The Judiciary Committee passed HB1233, which defines the start of probation as the moment a judge pronounces sentence in open court or upon entry of the written sentencing order, whichever occurs first.
Dinah Tyler, deputy director at Arkansas Community Correction, told the committee the measure responds to situations where probation supervision began before a sentencing order was entered and a later revocation was reversed by the Arkansas Supreme Court in CR-17-618 (opinion delivered March 28, 2018). Tyler said the change prevents probationary time from unintentionally extending beyond the court’s intended term when written orders are later entered.
Defense representatives urged caution. Jeff Rosenzweig of the Arkansas Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers said the bill does not address a separate requirement in Arkansas jurisprudence: before revocation, a defendant must have been given and have had the written rules of probation administered. Greg Parish of the Public Defender Commission and Rosenzweig said practices vary across counties; in some districts sentencing orders and probation conditions are prepared and signed immediately, while in others the paperwork can be delayed days or weeks.
Amber Schubert, general counsel at Arkansas Community Correction, said the bill narrowly targets the gap created by delayed entry of sentencing orders (months in some cases) and that judges and the attorney general’s office have reviewed the approach. Committee members suggested drafting boilerplate forms or local practices to ensure written probation rules are administered promptly.
The committee passed HB1233 as amended.
What comes next: The bill advances with sponsors saying they will coordinate with defense counsel and court staff on implementation and the committee signaled interest in interim work to minimize practical gaps.
