Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Curriculum Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee rejects bill limiting how race and ethnicity are taught after extended debate
Summary
After an amendment and extended debate about whether the bill would constrain teachers or prevent teaching hard history, the committee voted 4‑3 with one non‑vote to reject House Bill 17‑61, which would have restricted certain instructional content on race and ethnicity and left enforcement to local school boards.
A committee vote on House Bill 17‑61 failed after extended testimony and debate over how the measure would affect classroom instruction on race and ethnicity.
Representative Mark Lowry presented the bill, which he said relates to instructional materials and curriculum guides addressing racial and ethnic issues. He emphasized that the bill “does not at all infringe upon the teaching of black history” or historical incidents such as the 1957 Little Rock crisis or the Elaine riots, and argued the measure would prohibit curricular materials that teach any race or ethnicity is superior to another or that individuals are inherently racist.
An amendment—introduced and adopted in committee—removed a prior enforcement route that would have required school districts to appear before the State Board of Education; as amended the sponsor said enforcement would rest with local school boards. Iverson Jackson, introduced as a pastor and military veteran, spoke in favor and said, “I don't believe in race. I believe it's just one human race,” and urged the committee to prevent teaching that one race is superior.
Several senators pressed the sponsor about practical effects on teachers. Senator Elliott warned the bill may "tie the hands of teachers," asking how educators would avoid unintentionally causing feelings of guilt or shame when teaching difficult history. Representative Lowry replied that the bill aims to prevent instruction designed to make students feel guilt or shame and that districts would promulgate rules to clarify instruction.
After discussion the committee voted to give the bill a due pass and then took a roll-call vote. The recorded tally was: Senator Chesterfield (not voting); Senator English (yes); Senator Eads (yes); Senator Lading (no); Senator Stearch (no); Senator Beckham (yes); Senator Elliott (no); Senator Ervin (aye). The chair announced 4 ayes, 3 nays and 1 non‑voting; the bill failed in committee.
Supporters said the measure protects students from instruction that labels individuals as inherently racist or assigns group guilt; opponents warned it could limit teachers’ ability to present historical facts and make teaching sensitive topics more difficult. The amended bill left local school boards as the primary enforcement mechanism.
