Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Scholarship Eligibility Gpa Vs Act topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Restoring 2.5 GPA route for lottery scholarships stalls amid equity debate and large fiscal estimate
Summary
Senate Bill 4 62, which would restore a 2.5 grade‑point average eligibility path to the Arkansas Academic Challenge scholarship, prompted debate over test bias and equity and carries a $38.5 million fiscal estimate; the committee vote ended 4–4 and the bill did not pass.
Senate Bill 4 62, a proposal to restore a 2.5 GPA eligibility route alongside the ACT‑score threshold for Arkansas Academic Challenge scholarships, failed to win the committee's approval after extended debate about equity, predictive measures and fiscal cost.
Senator Joyce Elliott, sponsor of SB 4 62, framed the measure as corrective: she said removing the GPA route disproportionately excluded students of color and that the ACT‑only threshold treats scholarships as a "chance"‑based outcome. "We made a promise to them, and we broke it," Elliott said, urging restoration of the GPA criterion to reduce racial and socioeconomic disparities in award distribution.
Committee members and witnesses discussed research on standardized testing bias, classroom mitigation strategies, and which metric best predicts college persistence. Maria Markham and Division of Higher Education analytics noted an ACT score of 19 roughly corresponds to a high‑school GPA of about 2.74; staff said ACT 19 is in part a policy and affordability choice rather than a purely predictive one.
Fiscal staff explained the $38.5 million fiscal impact: using public‑school data, they estimated about 2,750 additional students per year would be eligible under a restored 2.5 GPA path (a conservative 'maximum' estimate used to compute a multi‑year cumulative cost). Members questioned whether the estimate assumed full take‑up (every eligible student enrolling and applying); staff said the figure was intentionally conservative to present a maximum possible cost.
After sponsor closings, the roll call recorded ayes from Senators Chesterfield, Lehi, Beckham and Elliott; with other members not voting, the chair announced the result as 4 ayes and 4 non‑voting and said the bill did not pass.
