Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Vouchers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultants present mixed evidence on vouchers and tax‑credit scholarships; Arkansas SUCCEED report provides state context
Summary
APA reviewed national voucher and tax‑credit scholarship designs and research showing mixed student achievement outcomes and variable budget impacts; presenters noted the SUCCEED scholarship (Arkansas) serves students with disabilities and is funded from a separate appropriation, and the committee asked for more Arkansas‑specific expenditure detail.
Consultants Jen Piscatelli and Justin Silverstein summarized national evidence on voucher and tax‑credit scholarship programs and explained how designs and funding rules shape both student outcomes and fiscal effects. Piscatelli said the team examined programs in comparison states and the available research literature and noted that studies show mixed impacts: some evaluations find negative effects on early achievement, others find neutral or mixed long‑term trends.
On Arkansas, Piscatelli described the SUCCEED scholarship program for students with disabilities, noting its eligibility rules (students must have attended public school one full academic year, with some exemptions) and that funding comes from a separate appropriation rather than being deducted from foundation aid. "The voucher amount is the lesser of the state's per‑pupil funding amount or the cost of the private school tuition," Piscatelli said; she added a recent March 2020 report includes detailed participation counts and program information.
Committee members asked whether negative early effects in some voucher studies reflect selection bias or other factors. Representative Meeks said many families who use vouchers may have different reasons for enrolling (bullying, dissatisfaction), and asked whether studies account for that. Piscatelli replied that higher‑quality evaluations attempt to compare voucher students to similar peers and control for observable factors, but that specific program designs and implementation details affect results.
Legislators also raised questions about funding implications, particularly for students with individualized education programs (IEPs). Justin Silverstein noted that several voucher programs cap voucher amounts at a foundation level that can be lower than actual IEP costs, which can shift additional service costs to receiving schools and complicate comparisons of per‑student cost and service levels.
Presenters agreed to provide the committee with the SUCCEED report and to check whether the report includes average expenditures for participating students; they flagged that 2019–20 participation was 426 students statewide in the SUCCEED program.
