Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Mental Health topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee reviews national models and Arkansas data on student mental‑health staffing
Summary
Consultants told the committee that student mental‑health needs are high and that Arkansas compares favorably on some counselor ratios; they recommended screening, MTSS/Whole Child approaches and targeted grants, and pledged to return with more state‑level granularity.
Janie Pistaceli of APA told the Senate Education Committee that national evidence points to rising youth mental‑health needs and gaps in school staffing to respond.
Pistaceli cited the National Alliance on Mental Illness figure that about 1 in 5 youth has a mental‑health condition and noted that suicide is the third leading cause of death for ages 10–19 (CDC). Using NCES 2017 data, she reported national averages and comparisons: Arkansas was presented as having about 67 students per student support professional (the study’s SREB+Massachusetts comparison set showed Arkansas near the low end for student support ratios) and about 385 students per guidance counselor reported in the materials.
The presentation reviewed four commonly adopted frameworks — the Whole Child/Whole Community model, MTSS (multi‑tiered systems of support), the American School Counselor Association model and the federally funded AWARE grant model (SAMHSA) — and state policy actions such as targeted grants, training requirements (Ohio’s suicide‑prevention training example) and staffing targets tied to accreditation or funding.
Representative Denise Garner asked whether interventions are moving younger in grade level; consultants said some interventions do begin earlier, and they will research district practices further. Representative Mark Lowery asked the chairs to narrow comparison states to the SREB plus Massachusetts if the committee prefers; consultants said they can do that and will work with the chairs to refine the comparisons.
Consultants recommended the committee ask for updated, Arkansas‑specific data and to consider how COVID‑era shifts (telemedicine, remote delivery) could change service delivery; they agreed to return with more granular state and district numbers and examples.
