Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the AP Training topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee approves bill easing AP professional-development rules; advocates warn against gradual AP replacement

Senate Education Committee · March 13, 2019
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

SB 478 expands what professional development may qualify AP teachers for weighted credit, allowing College Board‑endorsed or similarly rigorous department‑approved trainings; GT/AP advocates urged safeguards to avoid replacing AP with concurrent-credit courses.

The Senate Education Committee voted to pass SB 478 after a detailed exchange about maintaining rigor for Advanced Placement courses while expanding approved professional‑development options.

Senator Jane English and Stacy Smith of the Department of Education said the bill allows the department to recognize College Board‑endorsed trainings or other department‑approved, similarly rigorous programs in place of the Advanced Placement Summer Institute (APSI) for the purposes of weighted credit and teacher professional development. Smith said the department would develop rules and an approval process with more than one reviewer to ensure training meets APSI-level rigor.

Representatives of AGATE (gifted and talented education) and other AP advocates supported the bill’s flexibility but warned it could make it easier for districts to replace AP courses with concurrent-credit offerings over time. Davis Hendricks (Arkansans for Gifted and Talented Education) urged safeguards, asking that the state office for GT and AP be included in rulemaking so AP protections remain in place.

Stacy Smith said the department has consulted College Board, which deferred training determinations to the state, and pledged to involve GT/AP experts at the rules stage. Committee members asked about who would pay for training days and whether districts would be required to provide stipends; ADE staff said districts generally cover days beyond contract time and stipends exist for APSI attendance.

After discussion and public comment, the committee recorded a motion to pass SB 478 and the motion carried.

What’s next: ADE will participate in rule development to define allowable trainings; the committee’s action sends the bill to the next legislative step.