Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Yarmouth officials, consultant outline steps to speed development and address workforce housing
Summary
At an Aug. 13 Community Economic Development Committee interview, town leaders and consultant Jeff Bagg of BSC Group identified permitting delays (state reviews), limited grant-writing capacity, wastewater and broadband needs, and seasonal/workforce housing shortages as core constraints; the team plans public engagement Sept. 26 and a larger workshop in January.
The Town of Yarmouth’s Community Economic Development Committee met Aug. 13 for an interview with consultant Jeff Bagg of BSC Group to identify barriers and near‑term actions to support local businesses, housing and capital projects. The session focused on permitting delays—especially state-level reviews—building local grantsmanship, wastewater and broadband infrastructure, and seasonal/workforce housing shortages.
Bagg said the firm is roughly midway through assessing existing conditions and will host a public meeting Sept. 26 at the senior center to reintroduce the comprehensive plan; a more robust facilitated workshop is scheduled for January to develop specific action items and costs. “We’re sort of at the beginning to midway through assessing existing conditions,” Bagg said, and added that the outreach will test action items and help the town prioritize projects.
Committee members and Select Board representatives repeatedly described permitting as a major impediment. One participant cited the Riverwalk Park review as an example: local permits processed quickly while state processes—environmental notification, Cape Cod Commission DRI, MassDEP and Chapter 91 reviews—caused the longest delays. A member advising the committee urged the town to staff a single coordinator to “quarterback” projects and meet early with developers so ZBA, planning board and building department reviews are coordinated and public concerns are addressed sooner.
Committee members also recommended investing in grantsmanship. One participant argued that hiring staff or contracting grant writers could unlock state and federal programs—including the MassLeads infrastructure funding—and that grant staff costs could be covered by awards the town wins. Several people urged clearer, upfront guidance to developers about which approvals require Cape Cod Commission or state-level review.
Workforce and seasonal housing emerged as a pressing operational constraint for local businesses. Speakers said employers often rely on off‑Cape workers and that insufficient workforce housing limits business expansion. Suggestions included mixed‑use redevelopment, motel or hotel conversions to employee housing, ADUs and continued use of the affordable housing trust and CPA funds. “There is no number that’s firm on what the exact amount of seasonal housing is,” a committee member said; the group recommended collecting specific data from local businesses on employee housing needs.
Capital priorities named by participants included wastewater improvements and broadband expansion. A planning board representative noted that fiber runs along Route 28 but that the main cost is connecting businesses and residences from trunk lines. Several speakers recommended pursuing regional broadband funding via the Cape Cod Commission and the Mass Broadband Initiative (MBI) to capture available statewide dollars.
The committee discussed reuse of the former Mattakee Middle School site as a potential economic driver; members favored mixed‑use redevelopment with housing, community spaces and possible wastewater connections to enable higher‑density use. Select Board member Mark Forrest emphasized weaving heritage tourism into the town’s economic strategy, calling local history a “key” asset to attract private investment.
The meeting also covered communications and outreach: the town has recently hired a communications director, and members urged more proactive content—site‑plan highlights and social content—to keep residents and businesses informed about projects and opportunities.
Procedurally, committee members confirmed upcoming meetings in August/September, agreed to continue committee reorganization at a later date, and moved to adjourn. The consultant’s next public engagement is Sept. 26; the committee will take the consultant’s January workshop and draft action items into account when refining zoning, staffing and capital recommendations.
Adjournment: a motion to adjourn was made, seconded and approved by voice vote.
What to watch next: the Sept. 26 public meeting at the senior center and the consultant‑facilitated workshop in January, which the committee said will bring draft action items and estimated costs for council review.
