Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Seaside Festival topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Yarmouth festival organizer seeks extra TRPF support as town’s $50,000 allocation draws questions

Town of Yarmouth Community Economic Development Committee · September 10, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Jan Butler asked the Community Economic Development Committee for an extra $13,500 from the town’s Tourism Revenue Preservation Fund to cover public‑safety details and festival costs for the Seaside Festival. Committee members said a $50,000 town‑meeting appropriation exists for parades/festivals but disagreed which body controls that money and agreed to seek clarification from the Select Board.

Jan Butler asked the Town of Yarmouth Community Economic Development Committee on Sept. 10 for an additional $13,500 from the Tourism Revenue Preservation Fund to cover police, fire and production costs for this year’s Seaside Festival.

"This is our 45th year. We're trying to make it bigger and better," Jan Butler said, describing uncertainty about whether the $50,000 set aside at town meeting could be used for festival details and whether the committee should recommend an additional TRPF payment.

Committee members told Butler that town meeting had indeed approved a $50,000 line described for parades and the Seaside Festival but that the line sits with the Select Board rather than with the CEDC. "That money is technically not ours. It's a Selectman's line item," one member said, noting a town‑staff email directing organizers to seek Select Board approval for use of the funds.

Members debated two options: the CEDC could (a) make a recommendation to the Select Board asking that a portion of the $50,000 be used for public‑safety details, or (b) consider allocating additional TRPF money now. Several members warned about precedent: covering public‑safety details for one event could set expectations for future requests.

"We could make a recommendation to the Selectmen to allocate a portion of that $50,000 for the public safety expenses," one member said, while others urged caution because the FY‑25 allocation technically covers next year's parade schedule and may not be immediately available as reimbursement.

Jan Butler said the extra funds would be used primarily to enhance fireworks and cover hotel costs and entertainer contracts if needed; she characterized much of the festival budget as vulnerable to last‑minute changes. Committee members acknowledged the festival’s large volunteer base and uncertain last‑minute costs and asked staff to seek a clearer interpretation from the Select Board and the town administrator before making a formal CEDC vote or payment.

Next steps: staff will draft a memo seeking clarification from the Select Board about the intent and administration of the $50,000 appropriation and report back to CEDC. The festival organizer agreed to wait for that clarification before requesting a formal TRPF disbursement.