Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Construction Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves change orders and athletic facility contracts amid budget updates
Summary
Trustees approved Change Order 7 for $170,008.15 and Change Order 8 for $31,169.38 for ongoing high‑school construction, and separately approved multiple athletic facility quotes including stadium light retrofits and new softball bleachers, with votes recorded 6–0 and 5–1 respectively.
Get email alerts on the Construction Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Marshalltown Community School District trustees on Nov. 18 approved two construction change orders and separately authorized several athletic facility contracts as part of ongoing bond‑funded renovation work.
FEH Design and contractors described unforeseen electrical issues discovered during demolition at the high school: corroded underground conduits and feeders requiring relocation and overhead rerouting. The board approved Change Order 7 for $170,008.15 to address the corroded conduits; FEH’s representative said the timing made it efficient to do the additional work while ceilings and access were already open. Change Order 8, covering eight contract revision requests (including floor box removals, additional outlets, greenhouse electrical and overhead door adjustments), totaled $31,169.38. The board voted to approve both change orders (motion carried 6–0).
District staff also presented quotes for athletic facility improvements and requested authorization to move forward on several projects. Approved items included DC Construction concrete for new softball bleachers ($27,300), American Aluminum Seating Inc. for softball bleacher materials and installation (combined quoted materials and installation items reported at $124,953 plus installation), Bolland Recreation sunshades for the tennis complex ($30,000), and a Musco stadium lighting retrofit (the motion listed $274,781 for lighting materials and an installation cost of $48,000). Board discussion covered ADA access, sequencing to avoid rework, potential USTA grant support for tennis shades and longer‑range considerations for playing-surface improvements and possible turf (estimated rough order-of-magnitude $1.5–2 million for multiple fields). The athletic facilities motion passed 5–1 after discussion about bid details and contractor design responsibility.
District financial staff reported the project remains under the original $10 million estimate, with roughly $2.2 million in projected underrun despite the approved change orders. Staff said outstanding punch‑list items and some epoxy floor work would need to be completed when spaces are less occupied.
Board minutes record the approvals and directed staff and contractors to proceed with scheduling and final punch‑list coordination.

