Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fate council adopts modest updates to zoning and development fees; ordinance O2024-059 passes 5–1
Summary
After staff presented adjustments to development and zoning fees (some increased, some lowered), the council voted to adopt Ordinance O2024-059; the motion passed 5–1 with Mayor Billings the lone dissenting vote. Staff said changes aim to better align fees with staff effort and estimated the department recovers roughly 15% of its costs from fees.
Get email alerts on the Development Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ryan, a city planning staff member, told council that his office reviewed comparable cities and recommended targeted adjustments to the development fee schedule in Ordinance O2024-059. He said most fees were appropriate but a handful were restructured to reflect staff time and level of effort; he also corrected a memorandum line that mistakenly listed residential/commercial replats as increased when they were decreased.
Why it matters: The fee schedule affects developers, small-property owners and the planning department’s cost recovery. Ryan said the department's fees account for roughly 15% of departmental revenue and that the proposed changes overall represent a modest net increase based on projected permit activity.
Council debate centered on methodology and economic development. Councilmember Lance asked whether fees were set by looking at other cities or by estimating actual staff costs; Ryan said staff focused on level-of-effort and staff time rather than copying another city's numbers. Councilmember 14 warned Fate’s fees were on the higher side compared with peers, and staff noted the city earlier lowered commercial impact fees to encourage development.
Vote and outcome: Councilmember (speaker 8) moved to adopt Ordinance O2024-059 and was seconded by (speaker 9). The motion passed by a recorded voice tally of 5–1; Mayor Billings cast the sole ‘‘no’’ vote. The council did not alter the substantive fee structure during the meeting but directed staff to provide redlines and supporting materials as the ordinance moves to final adoption procedures.
Votes at a glance: - Ordinance O2024-059 (zoning and development fees): Passed 5–1 (Mayor Billings no). Motion made by speaker 8 and seconded by speaker 9. - Consent agenda (routine items): Passed by voice vote 6–0 earlier in the meeting.
What’s next: Staff will post the redlined ordinance and return the item for finalization per standard ordinance adoption procedures.

