Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Arpa Funds topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Levelland council reviews remaining $896,000 in ARPA funds, seeks priorities for generators, zoning and broadband
Summary
City staff told the council Levelland received about $3.3 million in ARPA funds and has roughly $896,000 available; councilors discussed using the remainder for generators, security upgrades, a zoning rewrite, compensation planning, studies and broadband projects and asked staff to return with an allocation plan.
Get email alerts on the Arpa Funds topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff told the Levelland City Council on Nov. 1 that the city originally received approximately $3,300,000 in federal ARPA funds and has about $896,000 remaining to allocate. The presentation framed the remaining balance as time-sensitive: staff said the city must either expend or formally allocate the funds by year-end to comply with program guidance.
The City Manager summarized candidate uses for the balance and asked the council for direction. Staff listed high-cost items including standby generators, building security upgrades, a comprehensive zoning ordinance rewrite and a compensation plan for city employees; lower-cost options included studies (a swimming-pool feasibility study and an animal-shelter services study), broadband and communication-tower support, and several budgeted capital items that could be shifted to ARPA. "We have approximately $896,000 in that fund at this time," staff said, noting some projects discussed during the recent budget and some that arose from storm-related needs.
Council members asked about cost ranges for specific items and practical constraints such as power capacity for large generators and potential Federal reporting requirements. One councilor raised a communications-tower proposal as a long-running need; staff cautioned that siting and aviation/flight-plan constraints could complicate that option. Staff also recommended using categorical allocations (for example, a "park improvements" bucket) rather than listing single projects with exact dollar amounts to avoid losing unspent funds if estimates come in lower than budgeted.
The discussion emphasized balancing immediate disaster-related needs and longer-term investments. Staff said ARPA funds could also be used to support previously budgeted items where insurance or other sources fell short and recommended returning to council with a proposed resolution showing specific categories and items for allocation before the Dec. 16 meeting. The council did not adopt a resolution at the Nov. 1 meeting but asked staff to prepare recommended allocations and additional cost estimates for review in December or January.
The next procedural step is for staff to draft an allocation/resolution and return to the council with cost estimates and proposed categories; any final commitments will be subject to council approval and federal program rules.

