Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Social Services topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

After hours of public comment, zoning board approves Romero House special-use permit for 702 Clark Avenue with limits on occupancy and operational conditions

Ames Zoning Board of Adjustment · March 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

By a roll-call vote, the Ames Zoning Board of Adjustment approved a special-use permit for Romero House at 702 Clark Avenue, adopting staff's refined conditions: weekday hospitality hours (1'4 p.m.) and Sunday hours (10:30 a.m.' 4 p.m.), maximum 25 people at any one time during hospitality windows with a cumulative cap of 45 for the service period, a 10-person cap outside hospitality, no overnight stays, and site, parking and monitoring conditions.

The Ames Zoning Board of Adjustment voted on March 26 to grant Romero House a special-use permit to operate at 702 Clark Avenue, imposing detailed conditions on hours, occupancy, access, parking and monitoring after more than three hours of testimony and discussion.

Staff framed the issue as a new allowance in the single-family conservation overlay: the City Council recently amended the overlay to permit consideration of one additional social-service provider on lots that abut a commercial zone. Planning staff described the proposed use as two functions: administrative office space and daytime hospitality services (meals, hygiene, laundry and an interior rest area). Staff recommended approval with refined conditions that clarify scope and measurement of intensity by counting people rather than by attempting to distinguish guests from volunteers and staff.

Key conditions adopted by the board include: - Hours and occupancy: hospitality services weekdays from 1 to 4 p.m. (peak), Sundays 10:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.; no more than 25 people on site at any single time during hospitality hours and a cumulative total of no more than 45 people during the hospitality period; at non-hospitality hours, a maximum of 10 people on site including employees. - No overnight stays or short-term lodging; the use is explicitly non-residential. - Access and circulation: staff recommended access from Seventh Street with a sidewalk and a gated walkway through the fence rather than routing pedestrians through the alley. - Parking: staff proposed crediting three surface parking spaces (two tandem in front and one gravel space at the alley) but noted that gravel cannot be paved under overlay rules; the garage is available for parking if the applicant chooses. - Monitoring and reporting: a log requirement to account for all persons on site during operations, a contact list to be shared with the Old Town Neighborhood Association on request, and enforcement through city inspection codes with potential citation and revocation hearing processes for repeated violations.

The public record showed divided neighborhood reaction. Supporters, including long-time volunteers and some neighbors, told the board Romero House provides meals, hygiene and connections to services and that volunteers receive de-escalation training. Volunteer Ella Townsend said, "we are frequently retrained on de escalation, and there's an emphasis on a culture of calmness and a culture of sobriety at the Romero House." Applicant David Thielen said Romero House works within a local ecosystem of services and affirmed acceptance of the 17 conditions: "We agree to the conditions that are laid out for us, the 17 conditions. We have no issue with that."

Opponents said the submitted late revisions to conditions limited the public's ability to respond and raised concerns about neighborhood impacts, public safety, and enforcement. Anne Kinsell urged the hearing be adjourned so the public could review changes, saying, "this public hearing needs to be adjourned and continued"; the chair denied that motion. Several neighbors asked for smaller occupancy caps and stronger, explicit enforcement mechanisms.

Board members asked detailed questions about training, naloxone availability (applicant: "Yes"), queuing and congregating practices, and whether the municipal code allows time-limited special-use permits (staff: generally not). After deliberation, White House moved to adopt the revised Alternative 1 as presented by staff; McDaniel seconded. A roll-call vote recorded aye votes and the board approved the special-use permit with the refined conditions. The board noted that appeals may be filed to a court of record within 30 days of the filing of the decision.

The permit remains subject to code enforcement and the city's existing processes for citations and revocation if conditions are repeatedly violated. Staff noted that discontinuance of the use for 12 months would create automatic expiration under city rules.