Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Subdivision topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning board approves preliminary subdivision for 61 Walden Street; conditions set for grading, tree removal and drainage

Town of Concord Planning Board · August 29, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Concord Planning Board unanimously approved the preliminary subdivision plan and certificate of approval for Stampski & McNary Inc. at 61 Walden Street, adding conditions to separate roadway/driveway tree removal and to require definitive-plan responses to engineering, fire and public-works comments.

The Town of Concord Planning Board on Aug. 27 voted unanimously to approve a preliminary subdivision plan and certificate of approval for a proposal by Stampski & McNary Inc. to construct a new roadway and create two building lots at 61 Walden Street (Parcel 0274-2).

Planning staff summarized a draft decision that included previously discussed waivers and explicit conditions requiring any later definitive plan to address engineering, fire-department, board-of-health, and Concord Public Works (water and sewer) comments. Staff emphasized a specific condition that definitive plans must clearly separate grading and tree removal associated with the roadway and drainage from tree removal for individual house lots, noting that roadway/tree removal is exempt from the town's tree-preservation bylaw while lot-level tree removal is not.

Board members discussed jurisdictional limits: planning board authority over subdivision and site plan review differs from the Board of Appeals' authority over earth-removal and special permits. Planning staff noted precedent from a past Main Street subdivision that involved large volumes of earth-moving and litigation, and stressed that a preliminary plan has no standing to give the applicant any build rights; definitive plans will be subject to more detailed review.

When members asked whether the board could condition applicants to pursue specific driveway configurations (for example, a joint driveway), staff replied the board lacks jurisdiction to require specific private negotiations but may strongly suggest applicants explore options with adjacent landowners.

The chair called for a motion to approve the preliminary plan and certificate of approval for 61 Walden Street. The board voted in favor by voice; no members opposed.

Staff said signatory pages will be signed following the statutory timeline and submitted to the Land Court/Registry of Deeds as part of post-approval procedure. The applicant confirmed they had reviewed the draft decision and had no objections at the hearing.