Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Construction topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board reviews construction change orders; no net contract increase, contingency reallocations noted

Ozark R-VI Board of Education · December 19, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board reviewed change orders tied to storm-shelter and parking-lot work, including a $25,256 reinstall of asphalt and smaller items paid from contingency; presenters said the overall contract amount did not change.

During new business, district construction staff outlined two change-order areas tied to the storm-shelter/multipurpose project and other work. Staff said the total contract price remained unchanged and that items were being moved between contingency and contract lines.

Specific items cited: a $308 cost for recessed fire-extinguisher cabinets found after summer HVAC work; $2,357 to re-balance circuits tied to a storm-shelter inverter (covered by contingency); and a $25,256 reinstall of existing asphalt at the middle-school parking lot that was charged to the contract’s per-unit yardage item but moved from contingency. Staff also reported a $5,175 savings from a proposed roofing substitution that would move that amount back into contingency.

Eric Russell and Dr. Russell (speakers introduced during the change-order discussion) described improved parking-lot flow after the work, saying car-line times were reduced and parents had easier access for pick-up and appointments. Board members asked clarifying questions about how contingency funds are tracked; staff said unused contingency funds remain in the bond project account and can be used for other general construction items in the bond program.

Why it matters: The change orders affect how bond-project contingency funds are allocated and the district’s capital-project accounting, but staff said they did not increase the contract total. The board asked that contingency usage be described carefully to avoid minimizing taxpayer cost.

Next steps: Staff will continue to manage contingencies and report bond-project balances in future reports.