Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Stormwater Utility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission hears stormwater utility budget plan; staff outline $1.1M first‑year target
Summary
Staff presented a stormwater utility plan to fund MS4 compliance, maintenance and capital projects. Year‑one funding needs were estimated at about $1.1 million (capital ~$528k, non‑capital ~$572k); the commission asked staff to coordinate with FinCom and to develop fee models tied to impervious area.
Public Works staff presented a detailed update Sept. 11 on the proposed stormwater utility enterprise fund and the work needed to operate, inspect and maintain the town’s stormwater system.
Sammie (the stormwater engineer) summarized the program’s objectives: meet MS4 permit requirements, reduce flooding and control water pollution. Weston/Western Sampson (the consultant engaged in 2023 with ARPA funding) completed a preliminary evaluation in January 2024, and a town bylaw establishing the stormwater utility was approved at the 2024 annual town meeting. Staff said the FY‑1 target budget is about $1.1 million, split roughly $528,000 capital and $572,000 non‑capital for permit compliance, staffing, routine inspection and monitoring.
Capital items described included installing best management practices (bio‑retention basins, rain gardens, pervious pavement), repairing failing drainage structures and acquiring a smaller trailer/jetter unit for storm pipe cleaning. Staff reported the town has about 3,800 catch basins but has inspected only about 345 (≈10%); the plan calls for outside contractors to help clear the backlog so routine maintenance can be sustained in‑house thereafter. The non‑capital budget would cover MS4 compliance tasks such as outfall screening, sampling, drainage mapping and an asset management plan.
Staff outlined fee‑model options under development: a flat fee, tiered rates and an ERU (equivalent residential unit) approach based on measured impervious area. The bylaw allows credits and incentives and staff said models aim to incentivize reduced impervious cover. Commissioners emphasized equity concerns for properties with atypical lot compositions (for example, parking‑heavy parcels with small residences) and asked staff to define hardship or credit programs in upcoming presentations.
Carlin Reed (Finance Committee member, speaking as a resident) requested the stormwater team meet the Finance Committee (possibly in October) and be prepared to clearly define what is a capital versus non‑capital expense. Staff agreed to coordinate with the finance director on timing. Implementation is intended to align with the 2025 annual town meeting for budget approval, with fee approvals by the Public Works Commission to follow.
Staff will return with refined fee models, credit proposals and a more detailed outreach and implementation schedule.
