Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Concord staff outline plan to draw down recreation fund for capital, transfer maintenance costs to Public Works
Summary
Town staff proposed using the recreation revolving fund to finance planned capital and maintenance work — including Emerson Pool repairs, Rideout courts and portions of the Hunt building — and to transfer about $99,000 in field maintenance labor/materials to Public Works, while BD Center capital needs were also presented.
Assistant town manager Jessica Porter, recreation staff and the BD Center general manager presented the Select Board with a multi‑year plan to align recreation program finances with capital and maintenance needs.
The town reported an unaudited FY24 recreation revolving fund balance of about $2.09 million and said program fees account for roughly 95–98 percent of revenue. Staff proposed drawing the balance down toward a target of approximately $1 million over a number of years by funding priority capital projects such as Emerson Pool liner and deck work, Hunt Recreation Building upgrades, Rideout tennis and basketball court repairs, and set aside support for Jerome Park maintenance tied to a CPC application.
Staff also recommended a recurring transfer to Public Works to cover recreation'related field maintenance. Using detailed time‑and‑materials data from Public Works, the presentation identified a starting contribution of roughly $99,000 (labor and materials) this fiscal year to make cost recovery more transparent and consistent with actual maintenance work on fields used by recreation programs.
On the BD Center enterprise fund, staff reported an unaudited FY24 ending balance of about $4.67 million and presented a prioritized capital list (roof repairs, pool area painting, a UV water‑treatment upgrade and potential elevator work). Managers said the BD Center is a high energy‑use facility and that roof restoration must precede a meaningful solar discussion; a structural review would be required before any installation.
Board members asked for clearer labeling of spreadsheets and more explicit separation of capital vs. maintenance items; staff agreed to refine the plan and to work with the board on fee policy that accounts for total program cost (labor, maintenance and capital). Several members complimented the level of detail and the collaborative work with Public Works but advised that drawing the fund down requires a strategy for future revenue/fee adjustments so the fund remains sustainable.
Next steps: staff will refine the plan documents, clarify the Jerome Park placeholder, and return with updated projections and recommended fee policy adjustments for board consideration.
