Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Flag Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Concord Select Board tables heated debate over ceremonial flags and lamppost displays
Summary
After more than an hour of discussion and public comment, the Concord Select Board tabled revisions to its ceremonial‑flag policy and asked staff to separate rules for an official town center flag from requests to place decorative banners or flags on streetlight poles. The board cited legal risk, logistics and delegation of authority for further work.
Get email alerts on the Flag Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Concord Select Board on Monday tabled a proposed update to the town's flag policy after an extended discussion about where and how ceremonial flags should be flown.
Members debated whether ceremonial requests — such as raising a single flag at the town center to mark an observance — should be decided by the Select Board and whether smaller flags or banners mounted on light‑pole holders should follow the same process. Some board members warned of legal exposure and operational costs if the town allows additional flags on right‑of‑way poles; others said small decorative displays are a practical tool for promoting community events and expressed concern that an overly restrictive policy would limit civic celebrations.
The public spoke strongly for broader flexibility. Michael Williams urged the board to use inclusive language in town policy; a resident representing a local civic group said light‑pole decorations help "promote the upcoming events" and bring the community together. A community member who identified himself as supportive of Pride displays argued that the debate grew out of a request to fly a Pride/Progress flag and asked the board not to withdraw public recognition of groups.
Town staff and some board members proposed separating the two issues in the policy text: retain a Select Board decision and a single‑pole ceremonial process for government speech at Monument Square, and create a distinct administrative permitting path — with clear applicant responsibilities and cost‑recovery provisions — for decorative flags or banners on streetlight holders that function as promotional infrastructure for events.
Board members also discussed operational constraints. Staff noted that installing or removing lamppost flags requires a bucket truck and cannot be guaranteed within a 24‑hour window; that logistical reality fueled calls for a clear administrative process and possible fees to defray overtime or equipment costs.
After airing competing views on delegation (Select Board versus town manager), legal risk, the definition of "ceremonial" flags, and the operational cost of installation, the Select Board voted to table the matter for further drafting and to return with language that distinguishes ceremonial center‑pole proclamations from promotional or decorative lamppost displays.
The board did not make any substantive change to the town's rules at the meeting; members said they would bring the item back with a redraft that separates ceremonial authority from promotional banner procedures.

