Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Concord board narrows but defers final action on ceremonial flag policy after legal review requested

Town of Concord Select Board · September 10, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Select Board advanced a draft municipal flag policy that would formalize ceremonial flags, but left unresolved whether ceremonial flags may fly on temporary light-pole holders and whether flags should be allowed for more than a single day; the board asked staff to revise language and seek town counsel review before returning with a final draft.

The Select Board spent extended discussion on a draft flag policy intended to codify how the town flies U.S., military, state, U.N./sister-city and ceremonial flags, and the process for Select Board-sponsored ceremonial flag requests.

Subcommittee members and staff explained the draft, which describes a Select Board member bringing ceremonial-flag requests to the town manager for approval and includes suggested process language that staff reviewed with town counsel. Key disagreements among members centered on three questions: whether ceremonial flags should be flown on the town center flagpole only or also on temporary holders attached to light poles; how long a ceremonial flag may remain raised (the draft suggested a single day but allowed board discretion); and the use of wording implying the flagpole display is a "non-public forum," which several members found confusing and asked counsel to reword.

Members favored memorializing current practice for the town-center pole but asked staff to remove or reword the contested language about temporary light-pole flags and to consult town counsel about the "non-public forum" phrasing. The board directed staff to return with a revised draft and legal review; it did not vote to adopt the policy at this meeting.

Select Board members emphasized consistency, clarity about costs (deployment/removal and overtime for Public Works or Fire Department support), and an expectation of public input for decisions that expand or change long-standing practice.