Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Curriculum topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Springfield R-XII board adopts recommended curriculum materials after debate over Newsela and foreign‑language/physics gaps

Springfield R-XII Board of Education · December 18, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Springfield R‑XII Board of Education on Dec. 17 approved recommended instructional resources after board members and public commenters raised questions about Newsela content selection and gaps in Spanish and physics materials; trustees said adoption does not preclude finding supplemental resources later.

The Springfield R‑XII Board of Education voted unanimously on Dec. 17 to adopt the district—s recommended instructional resource materials, following a period of public comment and board discussion about specific components of the package.

Board member Thomas Tate moved to adopt the materials; Vice President Brunner seconded the motion, which passed by verbal vote, 7–0. Board discussion focused on three items a member asked to highlight: the Newsela digital platform, a physics curriculum, and the availability of Spanish instructional materials at scale.

A board member said the district had assured them Newsela use would align with Missouri learning standards, be age appropriate and free of bias, and that teachers would curate content to classroom needs. That member emphasized the district—s ongoing review process and said adoption does not prevent the board or staff from seeking additional or alternative resources in areas where gaps remain. "It doesn't mean that we're committing to not having [a resource]," the board member said; "we always have the option to find a resource to add into our curriculum." (Board member comments were recorded during the curriculum item discussion.)

Superintendent Dr. Lathan and district staff reiterated that committees of professionals lead the curriculum-selection process and that the district will continue to search for resources that best fit state standards and local student needs. Board members asked staff to continue soliciting public and educator feedback and to pursue printed or supplemental materials where fiscal constraints allow.

The board moved the adoption after a brief public comment period earlier in the meeting in which speakers raised broader curriculum and resource concerns. The item had been removed earlier from the consent agenda at a board member's request to allow time for discussion.

Next steps: the district said it will continue implementation work, seek feedback from educators and families, and return to the board with any recommended supplementary materials. The district's formal adoption documentation and the full curriculum packet remain available through the board—s posted materials.